Experimental browser for the Atmosphere
Loading post...
{ "uri": "at://did:plc:3h2rnhl4eqtoylezk6572ec2/app.bsky.feed.like/3lom46czcts2t", "cid": "bafyreie6ipnvrkidrc4zwp4nfwtsgxbp6od2ylqrvev2iyk2ict76bgaay", "value": { "$type": "app.bsky.feed.like", "subject": { "cid": "bafyreiciopoun5e7xlm6siwmddcqmwhsb3umryurxosgt26p7m2djff5im", "uri": "at://did:plc:7zwztfs4yywggefayx7oid35/app.bsky.feed.post/3lom436sf2c2p" }, "createdAt": "2025-05-07T19:13:51.198Z" } }
Instead of engaging with that question, Florida moved to dismiss on a bunch of grounds, including saying NetChoice lacked standing to bring the claims. 3/ FL brief: www.courtlistener.com/docket/59942... NetChoice & CCIA response: www.courtlistener.com/docket/59942...
May 7, 2025, 7:12 PM