Experimental browser for the Atmosphere
Loading post...
{ "uri": "at://did:plc:4cf4xcam4vyxktxssgxu3mrv/app.bsky.feed.like/3lnuzrafaey2p", "cid": "bafyreif23o6qjzqxmue46in37veon4jsp4skdt7p7i5f25lbuhsaxgbicq", "value": { "$type": "app.bsky.feed.like", "subject": { "cid": "bafyreihf3ucum44cprfi5do7okkzdnkyg2ooj76vtprspjuv64bef4o5xi", "uri": "at://did:plc:3wdc7dmw4l7uxgwfwixm7lc5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lnuod5wouc2k" }, "createdAt": "2025-04-28T14:59:30.550Z" } }
I reviewed a paper recently. It was flawed & rejected. It later appeared unchanged in another journal. So how is peer review a “gold standard”? You can’t have a gold standard if people can’t tell the difference between gold and bauxite..
Apr 28, 2025, 11:34 AM