Experimental browser for the Atmosphere
I will probably sue the EHRC and I will publish my letters. Do you think a general audience would understand the point I'm making? How could it be improved?
May 11, 2025, 9:13 AM
{ "uri": "at://did:plc:5kydynj3pme74rk5ynru3m6d/app.bsky.feed.post/3lov4hsi7tk24", "cid": "bafyreigiphhnnb3q3hbwuojhv3btlyrp7qqoxpvpbvq7rh6djhnbyj7i6i", "value": { "text": "I will probably sue the EHRC and I will publish my letters. Do you think a general audience would understand the point I'm making? How could it be improved?", "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post", "embed": { "$type": "app.bsky.embed.images", "images": [ { "alt": "Summary of facts.\n\n7.1\n\nIt is understood that the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has changed the definition of \"sex\" under the Equality Act 2010. Instead of interpreting “men”, “women”, and other gendered terms as referring to people (who they are), the court interpreted them as referring to legal status (what they have). Those legal status are defined solely by the historical fact that trans people were segregated and objectified in 1975. The court referred to them as “biological sexes”, (while I refer to them as “1975-sexes” in this Summary) degrading everyone, cis, or trans, to the status of a mere thing. Importantly, the Court did not address the human rights implications of its decision.", "image": { "$type": "blob", "ref": { "$link": "bafkreic4lz7uziopdulycpaevk45o227yco2n4auyorp4dreiq6tpg5kva" }, "mimeType": "image/jpeg", "size": 475092 }, "aspectRatio": { "width": 2000, "height": 693 } } ] }, "langs": [ "en" ], "createdAt": "2025-05-11T09:13:07.162Z" } }