Experimental browser for the Atmosphere
Sam Fowles, a barrister, wrote an opinion in the guardian saying this: The supreme court didn’t rule on the definition of ‘a woman’ – this is what its judgment does mean | Sam Fowles www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Apr 16, 2025, 11:07 PM
{ "uri": "at://did:plc:a6eahjonfug5fe3xrduk5ljj/app.bsky.feed.post/3lmxpgxj3us2e", "cid": "bafyreibtajzopysyvr3xfrr4ovzyoavkv3j32lxkve22337i4q4dxziesu", "value": { "text": "Sam Fowles, a barrister, wrote an opinion in the guardian saying this: \nThe supreme court didn’t rule on the definition of ‘a woman’ – this is what its judgment does mean | Sam Fowles www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...", "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post", "embed": { "$type": "app.bsky.embed.external", "external": { "uri": "https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/16/supreme-court-definition-woman-judges-law?CMP=share_btn_url", "thumb": { "$type": "blob", "ref": { "$link": "bafkreidc5ax2re5vk62lqbkewcdvrawcsrj2qraworertwq45a3cpe62yq" }, "mimeType": "image/jpeg", "size": 368186 }, "title": "The supreme court didn’t rule on the definition of ‘a woman’ – this is what its judgment does mean | Sam Fowles", "description": "The judges had to interpret the law as set down by parliament. But it must be remembered this is not an abstract debate; it concerns real people, says barrister Sam Fowles" } }, "langs": [ "en" ], "reply": { "root": { "cid": "bafyreigpy2mqywjs3kx7dqxkppuogfwzvrpsoz5fmvxapygixq42dctx74", "uri": "at://did:plc:4jajixlbh346ugyindwqppwc/app.bsky.feed.post/3lmwssqaqzk2z" }, "parent": { "cid": "bafyreibcmxnintt7vpw4srushxy2g2jczhfo6vi43ozwfygdym5iptnrc4", "uri": "at://did:plc:undwnzsc24f23yqjyfekl6cv/app.bsky.feed.post/3lmwz7y5nas22" } }, "facets": [ { "index": { "byteEnd": 227, "byteStart": 192 }, "features": [ { "uri": "https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/16/supreme-court-definition-woman-judges-law?CMP=share_btn_url", "$type": "app.bsky.richtext.facet#link" } ] } ], "createdAt": "2025-04-16T23:07:36.195Z" } }