Experimental browser for the Atmosphere
Judge Millett raised the question at oral argument whether the Act might be constitutional even if effectively permits removal, given that refusing to comply with an order of the Judicial Council may not be good behavior. Judge Newman's position is that impeachment would be required.
Apr 26, 2025, 12:23 AM
{ "uri": "at://did:plc:cn54gi4w3anugyfn4czrrdw3/app.bsky.feed.post/3lnohvqeusc2i", "cid": "bafyreich2rmg66a5thvbta7tt7qecql56tyvfmc4zt75zv5mawnthxu2v4", "value": { "text": "Judge Millett raised the question at oral argument whether the Act might be constitutional even if effectively permits removal, given that refusing to comply with an order of the Judicial Council may not be good behavior. Judge Newman's position is that impeachment would be required.", "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post", "langs": [ "en" ], "reply": { "root": { "cid": "bafyreigvvjr6jfvtmabdmc3ykhbupxqtdmyo5dsiwfofmr5zf6igjn66oq", "uri": "at://did:plc:yokssolxkvz4lobktvx6yvxb/app.bsky.feed.post/3li37o44l6k2i" }, "parent": { "cid": "bafyreicum6bcpose6a3tl6borhrgqhnqzd4iate47rdmukpxp5nyl2pcaq", "uri": "at://did:plc:cn54gi4w3anugyfn4czrrdw3/app.bsky.feed.post/3lnohvqett22i" } }, "createdAt": "2025-04-26T00:23:55.831Z" } }