Experimental browser for the Atmosphere
Loading post...
{ "uri": "at://did:plc:d2tkhtm77uljwzywh4dbt4ot/app.bsky.feed.like/3loqwuugug32c", "cid": "bafyreic4w5ly6gh7nzlgf7izvsltfomcigl6wnwd4y2dblcqd4ytykxeyu", "value": { "$type": "app.bsky.feed.like", "subject": { "cid": "bafyreicw5uffvpltbrvkwyczjajhtln4pjzhbzvlmjmcjumtn4ctwdznwy", "uri": "at://did:plc:qrllvid7s54k4hnwtqxwetrf/app.bsky.feed.post/3loqvugwt5s2f" }, "createdAt": "2025-05-09T17:22:23.910Z" } }
Judge Sessions: The court agrees that Mapp v. Reno is the controlling standard. The court finds that Rümeysa Öztürk has sufficiently established all 3 factors: *very* substantial First Amendment claim. We asked govt 3 wks ago to introduce any evidence apart from op-ed! "There is no evidence here."
May 9, 2025, 5:04 PM