Experimental browser for the Atmosphere
Loading post...
{ "uri": "at://did:plc:npcitgod6k4wldfcd2fmzctt/app.bsky.feed.like/3lovuvz2xjn2h", "cid": "bafyreigq5xyct2it5iqdvj3bytnv5njwhddjehuijvwgoekdia2nazxr4e", "value": { "$type": "app.bsky.feed.like", "subject": { "cid": "bafyreibvnhfk5gv3y72jnncwnckxk25u5rrknofdagkxw6jqh4swegopnq", "uri": "at://did:plc:ugoqqhqhitgjtd5fhlan6oez/app.bsky.feed.post/3lovroo2o7s2b" }, "createdAt": "2025-05-11T16:30:33.524Z" } }
I’m no Constitutional Law expert, but having the president’s own employee ensure him that he’s not receiving a bribe doesn’t seem as sound a legal reasoning as they seem to think.
May 11, 2025, 3:32 PM