Experimental browser for the Atmosphere
In 1999, the Tennessee Court of Appeals compared a damaged tire shredder machine to the injury of David and his “lost value” as an enslaved person.
Feb 24, 2024, 2:26 AM
{
"text": "In 1999, the Tennessee Court of Appeals compared a damaged tire shredder machine to the injury of David and his “lost value” as an enslaved person.",
"$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
"embed": {
"$type": "app.bsky.embed.images",
"images": [
{
"alt": "Tire Shredders, Inc. v. ERM-North Central, Inc., 15 S.W.3d 849 (1999): Tire Shredders sued ERM for the negligent destruction of a shredding machine. In determining damages, the Court cited to Johnson v. Perry, stating the following in support of awarding damages pertaining to a tire shredder machine: “The court held that, if the injury had been temporary, the plaintiff could recover damages for the loss of the slave’s service. See id. at 572. If, however, the slave had been permanently injured, the plaintiff could recover damages for the deteriorated value of the slave in lieu of damages for loss of service. See id. Finally, if he had been killed, the plaintiff would have been entitled to damages equal to the actual value of the slave but would not have been entitled to recover damages for loss of the slave’s service.” Thus, in 1999, the Tennessee Court of Appeals compared a damaged tire shredder machine to the injury of the enslaved man David.",
"image": {
"$type": "blob",
"ref": {
"$link": "bafkreib4jiw4jlguujeuxg2cc7g472ycahpk66qj3e7x6wbbhklku7vuqq"
},
"mimeType": "image/jpeg",
"size": 666832
},
"aspectRatio": {
"width": 1080,
"height": 1080
}
}
]
},
"langs": [
"en"
],
"reply": {
"root": {
"cid": "bafyreib43juchzdnae4d6q5nzkzdrkof3q4gyuhwyltnlrve4gkovlst5a",
"uri": "at://did:plc:nwl4yljblliktfbqtyj4ns6r/app.bsky.feed.post/3km4xmy3vzm2d"
},
"parent": {
"cid": "bafyreib43juchzdnae4d6q5nzkzdrkof3q4gyuhwyltnlrve4gkovlst5a",
"uri": "at://did:plc:nwl4yljblliktfbqtyj4ns6r/app.bsky.feed.post/3km4xmy3vzm2d"
}
},
"createdAt": "2024-02-24T02:26:56.118Z"
}