Experimental browser for the Atmosphere
Loading post...
{ "uri": "at://did:plc:rt2dw4at5iv62b67p4anbwr7/app.bsky.feed.like/3lkrg3ymfrk2c", "cid": "bafyreih7vbkubecyfh5w6idchox7u6iig4ebdrdjqxwnwnadrap6on4yie", "value": { "$type": "app.bsky.feed.like", "subject": { "cid": "bafyreiduokwmdseopocnf2siradhraslfu6hfdzbxqfi4dxp54tudxdr5y", "uri": "at://did:plc:m65ifh7vn5zdgs7izcmht4gy/app.bsky.feed.post/3lkolexvdis2k" }, "createdAt": "2025-03-20T00:14:02.822Z" } }
5. In defending the ban, the state argued that gender-affirming care does not qualify as healthcare, relying on testimony from anti-trans medical “experts” and asserting that it was up to the legislature to determine what constitutes medical treatment. The judges rejected both arguments.
Mar 18, 2025, 9:10 PM