ATProto Browser

Record data

{
  "uri": "at://did:plc:ccrabc6xdnjx4l7btvynnng4/app.bsky.feed.post/3lolpoepffc2y",
  "cid": "bafyreiecp25rnaol2j5hpi7rrvwhhsbzpwk5imm5dmevcxtemfnafulsmq",
  "value": {
    "text": "There's a lot of things to talk about in this essay, but I think we aren't focusing on how much of an entitled shithead the guy in the beginning is. He's going to get a really rude awakening from life because he doesn't seem to think the rules apply to him.",
    "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
    "embed": {
      "$type": "app.bsky.embed.images",
      "images": [
        {
          "alt": "Chungin “Roy” Lee stepped onto Columbia University’s campus this past fall and, by his own admission, proceeded to use generative artificial intelligence to cheat on nearly every assignment. As a computer-science major, he depended on AI for his introductory programming classes: “I’d just dump the prompt into ChatGPT and hand in whatever it spat out.” By his rough math, AI wrote 80 percent of every essay he turned in. “At the end, I’d put on the finishing touches. I’d just insert 20 percent of my humanity, my voice, into it,” Lee told me recently.\n\nLee was born in South Korea and grew up outside Atlanta, where his parents run a college-prep consulting business. He said he was admitted to Harvard early in his senior year of high school, but the university rescinded its offer after he was suspended for sneaking out during an overnight field trip before graduation. A year later, he applied to 26 schools; he didn’t get into any of them. So he spent the next year at a community college, before transferring to Columbia. (His personal essay, which turned his winding road to higher education into a parable for his ambition to build companies, was written with help from ChatGPT.) When he started at Columbia as a sophomore this past September, he didn’t worry much about academics or his GPA. “Most assignments in college are not relevant,” he told me. “They’re hackable by AI, and I just had no interest in doing them.” While other new students fretted over the university’s rigorous core curriculum, described by the school as “intellectually expansive” and “personally transformative,” Lee used AI to breeze through with minimal effort. When I asked him why he had gone through so much trouble to get to an Ivy League university only to off-load all of the learning to a robot, he said, “It’s the best place to meet your co-founder and your wife.”\n",
          "image": {
            "$type": "blob",
            "ref": {
              "$link": "bafkreihhviyihlgqnf3veljpk3rtkxu6qqwiyq2d2zkl7hmfnvqiko7qye"
            },
            "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
            "size": 375966
          },
          "aspectRatio": {
            "width": 685,
            "height": 726
          }
        },
        {
          "alt": "By the end of his first semester, Lee checked off one of those boxes. He met a co-founder, Neel Shanmugam, a junior in the school of engineering, and together they developed a series of potential start-ups: a dating app just for Columbia students, a sales tool for liquor distributors, and a note-taking app. None of them took off. Then Lee had an idea. As a coder, he had spent some 600 miserable hours on LeetCode, a training platform that prepares coders to answer the algorithmic riddles tech companies ask job and internship candidates during interviews. Lee, like many young developers, found the riddles tedious and mostly irrelevant to the work coders might actually do on the job. What was the point? What if they built a program that hid AI from browsers during remote job interviews so that interviewees could cheat their way through instead?\n\nIn February, Lee and Shanmugam launched a tool that did just that. Interview Coder’s website featured a banner that read F*CK LEETCODE. Lee posted a video of himself on YouTube using it to cheat his way through an internship interview with Amazon. (He actually got the internship, but turned it down.) A month later, Lee was called into Columbia’s academic-integrity office. The school put him on disciplinary probation after a committee found him guilty of “advertising a link to a cheating tool” and “providing students with the knowledge to access this tool and use it how they see fit,” according to the committee’s report.\n",
          "image": {
            "$type": "blob",
            "ref": {
              "$link": "bafkreibn7oncv4yt6ucoeshsvukpt2bjjm4iripf6dvdiboazod4vl62r4"
            },
            "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
            "size": 306509
          },
          "aspectRatio": {
            "width": 674,
            "height": 614
          }
        },
        {
          "alt": "Lee thought it absurd that Columbia, which had a partnership with ChatGPT’s parent company, OpenAI, would punish him for innovating with AI. Although Columbia’s policy on AI is similar to that of many other universities’ — students are prohibited from using it unless their professor explicitly permits them to do so, either on a class-by-class or case-by-case basis — Lee said he doesn’t know a single student at the school who isn’t using AI to cheat. To be clear, Lee doesn’t think this is a bad thing. “I think we are years — or months, probably — away from a world where nobody thinks using AI for homework is considered cheating,” he said.\n",
          "image": {
            "$type": "blob",
            "ref": {
              "$link": "bafkreib5a2tjg3rhgkqgcspb6metnjpmcsk7qlav247nttfk5phe7ojwb4"
            },
            "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
            "size": 131102
          },
          "aspectRatio": {
            "width": 676,
            "height": 277
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    "langs": [
      "en"
    ],
    "createdAt": "2025-05-07T15:30:11.305Z"
  }
}